Uncover What's Hidden:
When Truth Matters Most

Northern California’s Premier Lie Detection Experts Using Advanced CVSA Technology

In a world full of uncertainty, the truth is your most powerful asset. Whether you’re facing legal challenges, corporate concerns, or personal disputes, our specialized services deliver answers when you need them most.

Of The 329 Confession Possibilites

Of The CVSA Examinations Produced A "Stress Indicated" Result

0 %

of those resulted in validated confessions

0 %

of interviews conducted, suspects made self-incriminating confessions

0 %

California Lie Detector: Your Trusted Partner in Unveiling the Truth

At California Lie Detector, we are committed to helping you uncover the truth with our cutting-edge deception detection services. Our arsenal of truth-seeking tools includes state-of-the-art Computer Voice Stress Analysis (CVSA) technology and comprehensive statement analysis techniques. These powerful methods have consistently led to breakthrough confessions and self-incriminating statements, providing the clarity and confidence you need to make informed decisions.

Whether you’re in law enforcement, legal practice, business, or an individual seeking answers, our expert team serves clients throughout Northern California with unparalleled accuracy and ethical standards. Our proven track record in lie detection and truth verification has made us the go-to resource for those who demand reliable results in high-stakes situations.

By leveraging advanced CVSA technology and our deep expertise in human behavior analysis, we offer a sophisticated approach to exposing deception and revealing hidden truths. Our services go beyond traditional polygraph tests, providing a more nuanced and effective method of truth discovery.

Don’t let uncertainty cloud your judgment. Trust California Lie Detector to illuminate the facts and help you confidently navigate complex situations. When the truth matters most, we deliver results you can rely on.

The Total Inventory Of CVSA Cases Submitted

which exceeded 3,000 was culled for cases that met the following criteria:

A confession was a
potential outcome

There was no involvement with veracity testing of previous statements

No employment clearance was involved

The case was not used as confirmation of prior witness testimony

The facts of the case were such that responses could be verified by means of CVSA follow-up questioning

These Crimes Included, But Not Limited To:

After excluding cases that did not meet all the above criteria, the criminal cases remaining for study in which legally admissible confessions were possible totaled 2,109. A total of 236 cases, involving 329 crimes

Multiple Homicides

Corporate Theft

Organized Crime

Contract Murders

Sexual Abuse Of Children

Arson For Hire

91%

of the cases studied represented criminal investigations in which legal authorities had reached an investigative impasse. After following standard investigative procedures, investigators had been unable to reach a firm conclusion as to guild or innocence.
Each subject named in the “Confession Possibility” list was individually interviewed by the CVSA examiner, with two goals in mind:

Each Interview Was Conducted According

to a standard protocol in which the wording of the interview, but not the methodology, was adapted on-site to each specific case. In each case, the CVSA procedure used by the examiner consisted of these steps:

The CVSA examiner was briefed by the requesting authorities in order to become familiar with the circumstances of each case​.

A pre-test interview with the subject was conducted.

The initial test questions were formulated and presented to the subject. Examinations contained from 9-31 questions, consisting of relevant, irrelevant, and control questions for which the subject provided "yes" or "no" answers.

The fourth step included processing the responses with the CVSA instrument, after which the resulting CVSA charts were analyzed and interpreted by the examiner.

If stress patterns associated with specific relevant questions were observed by the examiner, an opportunity was given for the subject to provide additional clarification regarding stress.

Provide a conclusion regarding the outcome of the CVSA examination. If the relevant questions produced a "No Stress" chart, the subject was "cleared" by the CVSA procedure then procedure will be turned over to the requesting agency.

An image of Rooney Law, the founder of California Lie Detector Test in Chico, California

More importantly, this study substantiates the CVSA is a useful and predictive decision support tool for separating the innocent from the guilty, and conclusively demonstrates the CVSA's ability to discriminate stress from no stress in the human voice.